URGENT: MARCH 23rd, 2013 OBAMACARE MANDATES RFID CHIP AND MANY OTHER UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWS THROUGH THE AID OF THE FDA
Click on my name to visit my Facebook Page and click HERE to check out my other highly informative blog posts.
WATCH THE RFID CHIP COMMERCIAL:
Remember March 21st, 2010 when Obamacare, also known as H.R. 3200, was passed? It wasn’t long after that the memes and articles were popping up about how everyone would have to start having the RFID chip implanted and of course they were called crazy conspiracy theorists as always just as they were when they talked about the Predator Drones. In typical fashion, the government supporting website SNOPES debunked the theory and their hasn’t been much above a quiet chatter since then and that really surprise me considering the 36 month grace period the bill allowed is over on March 23rd, 2013. Sure, RFID in badges has been talked about and in EBT cards. Remember the little girl in Texas that refused to wear one? If you want a refresher on her story just click HERE. I’m telling everyone reading this that RFID in H.R. 3200 is a reality and all anyone ever had to do was download the bill via PDF and HERE is the link, and do a few quick searches to FDA website to check out some terms. Since today is March 22nd, 2013 we better start reading. I have left all content from inside the bill in regular font with my heading in bold and italics, and what I did was place all section numbers, clauses, paragraphs, lines, ect… in bold. This will help you locate things a little easier if you decide to do your own research. Any videos provided are super important especially the procedure because it shows just how quickly it can be done with no office necessary. People can just be rounded up!
SNOPES DEBUNKED: THE REALITY OF RFID INSIDE OF H.R. 3200
H.R. 3200 section 2521, Pg. 1001, paragraph 1:
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the “registry”) to facilitate analysis of post-market safety and outcomes data on each device that ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.”
Page 1004 of the law (the only page anyone ever looks at or reads when researching this) dictates the timing of this chip, and I’m quoting it directly when I say, “Not later than 36 months after the date of the enactment”. It is now an enforceable law that by March 23rd 2013 we will all be required to have an RFID chip underneath our skin and this chip will be link to our bank accounts as well as have our personal records and tracking capability built into it.
WATCH THE CHIP BEING IMPLANTED LIVE OUTSIDE UNDER A TENT!:
DEFINING THE CLASS II IMPANTED MEDICAL DEVICE BY THE FDA
The Class II Implanted Medical Device was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2004 so a visit to the FDA is required to get to the bottom of this.
These chips are all part of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act:
A class II implantable device is an “implantable radio frequency transponder system for patient identification and health information.” “The purpose of a class II device is to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary.”
Going back to what we just looked at, the creation of the national medical device registry in section 2521, page 1002 line 5:
“In developing the registry, the secretary shall…”
And the law continues on with a myriad of steps and things that the secretary must do in the process of creating this registry. In this laundry list of items to do most are unimportant to our investigation but there are a few things such as: Line 17, subparagraph B: “validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in sub-paragraph A.“
Going back to sub-paragraph A (right above sub-paragraph B), it says: “including in the registry, in a manner consistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier;”
The very first two items in the list mandates that the secretary first gives a unique identification to each of the items listed in paragraph 1 which is: ‘‘a class III device; or a class II device that is implantable.”
Then, the very next thing the secretary is to do is to create the process by which “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”, which is electronic medical records, that are linked to these newly and uniquely identified items from paragraph 1 which are the class III and class II implantable devices.
Class III devises are items such as breast implants, pacemakers, heart valves, etc. A Class II device that is implantable is, as you seen from the FDA, an implantable radio frequency transponder, RFID chip. From breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B which is, “for linking such data with the information included in the registry”? As we know from subsection A, the information in the registry is the name of a device. In plain terms, we are in a clear way, being told that our electronic medical records are going to be linked to a class II implantable device! Continuing a few lines down in this same section, section B subsection ii still on page 1002, the “patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources”, that is to be linked is clearly spelled out as electronic medical records. It reads: “link data obtained under clause (i) with information in the registry”. Information in the registry is, as we know from sub-paragraph A, the name of the device. So what is the data obtained under clause i? Back up a few lines to clause i:
It reads: “obtain access to disparate sources of patient safety and outcomes data, including Federal health-related electronic data”. Again, from breast implants, to pacemakers, to RFID chips which one is the only possible one that can used for the stated purpose in section B? That stated purpose is “for linking such data” and the “such data” is electronic medical records.
What we already have already seen in just the creation of this registry, is the device that will serve as the link, which is an RFID microchip that is categorized as a Class II implantable device, as well as what it will be the link for which is your electronic medical records. In case the law wasn’t clear enough on that point, still in the laundry list of things to do a few more lines down on the next page, page 1005:
“The Secretary to protect the public health; shall establish procedures to permit linkage of information submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph A (remember sub-paragraph A is the class 2 implantable device reference) with patient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph 3, (which is electronic medical records); and to permit analyses of linked data;”
Continuing on to page 1007, in the STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA section, the secretary of health and human services is given full power to intact all mandates from the laundry list of to-do items in the creation process of the registry as well as dictate how the devises listed in the National Medical Device Registry are to be used and implemented. “The Secretary of the Health Human Services, acting through the head of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, shall adopt standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria for the electronic exchange and use in certified electronic health records of a unique device identifier for each device described in paragraph 1 (National Medical Device Registry), if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device.”
Now on Page 503, section E Lines 13-17 and I quote: “encourage, as appropriate, the development and use of clinical registries and the development of clinical effectiveness research data networks from electronic health records, post marketing drug and medical device surveillance efforts”. Did you just read that?! It said MEDICAL DEVICE SURVEILLANCE EFFORTS!
Now, let’s look at section 163 of HR3200. This is the section that is going to give the government direct electronic access to your bank account which will work in conjunction with an implanted chip that is MANDATORY.
Page 58 Lines 5 through 15 reads:
(D) enable the real-time (or near real time) determination of an individual’s financial responsibility at the point of service and, to the extent possible, prior to service, including whether the individual is eligible for a specific service with a specific physician at a specific facility, which may include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card; (E) enable, where feasible, near real-time adjudication of claims.”
What does this mean? It means that the government will give everybody a health ID card that contains a machine readable device (magnetic strip or RFID chip) similar to a credit card. Embedded in this chip or strip is your Health Identification Number and everyone will have their own unique number like a social security number only I’m betting it will be way harder to defraud, and what I mean by that is possibly a glyph of some sort like its own fingerprint, and when you visit a medical provider, the medical claims will be processed while you are still in the office. The medical providers will be paid in real time meaning right then and there, so no more billing. The portion that you owe will be deducted from your bank account, in real time, according to HR 3200 (Obamacare).
Notice here in this part which is at the beginning of 2000 plus pages of the law, it is carefully worded “which MAY include utilization of a machine-readable health plan beneficiary identity detection card”. Here we are told that it may be a card. As you have already seen, deeper in the law (Sec. 2521 Pg. 1000) what this “MAY” utilize is clearly spelled out as a “class II device that is implantable.”
We can only speculate at this point why the law is set up this way. Most likely this section was written to account for the gap in time from when the process of chipping begins to when everyone has received a chip. This is a means of starting with a card for the sake of expedience while the process of chipping citizenry plays out. One thing is certain the law mandates that within 3 years we will all have a chip under our skin that will serve this purpose, and the three years has arrived! March 23rd, 2013 is here!
Where does it say this in the law? The deadline set for the start of the registry on page 1006: “The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is “36 MONTHS” after the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date.” Also on page 259, this law requires the use of Electronic medical records system in all hospitals by 2012 which will leave a gap of at least a year before the class II implantable device is required.
Make no mistake about it guys, this is the New World Order tracking device and you will have to get it by law and that is going to go into effect on March 23rd. So, what’s it going to be this time? Are you going to get “chipped” like a dog and then jump on Facebook and complain about the Illuminati or are you going to flip the NOW your middle finger and tell them, “No thank you, I’d rather keep and die with my soul and my privacy instead of being your “tracked” livestock.”